Whether or not humans have the right to exploit nature is a key issue spotlighted by two texts. The first author underlines the threat of overexploitation of natural resources which results in the broken natural balance and requires the counteraction of joint conservation efforts. The second author, on the contrary, exonerates those who participate in resource depletion as the employment scarcity pushes them to work for unsustainable businesses.
The first text points out that the natural ecosystem exists according to its own concordant rules. Intruding into this well-balanced world and eradicating its inhabitants, humans damage wildlife. The human footprint has become an overriding concern for conservation activists who advocate for halting this adverse trend with united forces. One can hardly question the righteousness of this claim. If the evidence were needed, a reference to an outrageous number of extinct and endangered species as well as shrinking intact forests would be sufficient.
As for the second extract, it indicates that the pressing need to assure livelihoods forces some people to work for companies that misuse lands and seas. As a consequence, this workforce, albeit unwillingly, contributes to a greater extent of biodiversity degradation. I believe it could be the case in impoverished countries whose citizens strive to survive by any means.
Having said that, alternative workplaces in the regions might be created, whereas some types of resources are exhaustible and certain animal species will never be brought back to life. All in all, it is imperative that environmental matters be pushed into the global spotlight. Only with a great deal of ongoing support from conservation proponents could the situation be drastically remedied. Importantly, economic benefits should in no case prevail over the future of our planet as the latter may one day merely cease to exist, leading to people extinction.